Turn inspection, location, dispatch, verification, and archiving into a complete closed loop-
with clearer defect locations, faster response, and cleaner asset records.

Applicable Roles

Inspector · O&M Crew Lead · Asset Manager · Program Owner · Safety & Audit Teams

Pain Point 1 | Limited Connectivity Slows Verification and Response (More Stable Operations)

Mountain roads, rural corridors, and tunnels often have unreliable connectivity, which disrupts key-point verification and coordinated response.

Workflow 1 | Key-point verification without relying on public networks (Measure)

What: Control and key-asset point verification; re-checks when needed

How: Use 5W radio base (up to 30 km) to provide corrections without public networks; rovers use on-unit screens for quick checks and basic setup (advanced configs via controller).

Deliverables: Verification logs / re-check list (exportable, traceable)

Recommended kit 1 | Weak-network continuity kit

RTK base (5W radio, 30 km) + RTK rover (on-unit screen) + management software (archive/export/audit trail)

Suggested image: Multi-team segmented work visual

Pain Point 2 | Unclear Defect Locations Waste Field Time (More Efficient Inspections)

Mileage/chainage plus text is interpreted differently. Crews waste time re-finding defects and re-recording evidence.

Workflow 2 | Route inspection with structured defect capture (Inspect)

What: Capture defects with location + evidence + severity + notes along routes

How: Use GIS handhelds for most defect locations; centimeter-level positioning is sufficient and faster than high-precision staking; independent GNSS enables capture even without public networks; photos/notes are bound to location as one structured record.

Deliverables: Defect list (locatable, verifiable) / inspection package (exportable, archivable)

Recommended kit 2 | Route inspection efficiency kit

GIS handheld (centimeter-level defect location + structured capture) + management software (templates, aggregation, export)

Pain point 3 (More controllable) | Work orders don't close cleanly: who fixed it, what changed, who verified?

Information lives in chats and spreadsheets, status is opaque, and periodic reporting becomes manual stitching; audit packs are incomplete.

Workflow 3 | Work-order closure and periodic reporting (Manage)

What: Convert defects to work orders, dispatch, verify closure, and generate periodic reports

How: Use management software to enforce workflow, responsibilities, and audit trail; GIS handhelds collect before/after evidence with location (works offline); portable Windows devices support on-site review and report output.

Deliverables: Closure report (before/after evidence) / weekly-monthly reports / audit package

Recommended kit 3 | Closure + field reporting kit

Management software (workflow, stats, archive) + portable Windows tablet/laptop (field reporting) + GIS handheld (evidence capture) + RTK (key-point verification when required, incl. laser/visual staking in constrained areas)